![]() |
|
|
Imaging
Findings
Discussion Imaging
Findings Pulmonary
embolism can
be diagnosed accurately with pulmonary
angiography, which is recognized as the gold standard with a
sensitivity and specificity greater than 95%. Nevertheless, pulmonary
angiography is invasive and has been shown to have 6% morbidity
and a 0.5% mortality rate. Ventilation-perfusion
radionuclide lung scanning is the most frequently performed
noninvasive imaging
study for the diagnosis of pulmonary
embolism. A scan
showing a normal or low probability has a high negative predictive
value when the clinical suspicion of pulmonary
embolism is low,
and a high-probability scan has a high positive predictive
value when the clinical suspicion is high. Unfortunately, only
34% of cases correspond to these two categories, and large
differences in inter-observer reporting especially in the classification
of low- or intermediate-probability scan necessitates further
investigation to exclude or confirm pulmonary
embolism. Although
prior clinical probability and noninvasive tests are currently
used as the first-line technique to make the diagnosis of pulmonary
embolism, CT
angiography might be a better initial imaging
technique than ventilation-perfusion radio nuclide lung
scanning. However,
when helical CT
angiography has negative results and when clinical suspicion of
pulmonary embolism
remains high, pulmonary
angiography is still indicated. Further investigations are
necessary to assess the effectiveness
of CT angiography
compared with that of ventilation-perfusion radionuclide lung
scanning in particular, patient populations such as patients with
chronic obstructive
lung disease or other coexistent morbid conditions. Net Links
Dr. Ashok Raghavan, Manipal
Hospital, Bangalore
|